This article examines how pragmatic markers in both English and Uzbek conversations are used by men and women. Pragmatic markers are small words or expressions (e.g., “you know”, “well”, “bilasanmi”, “ya’ni”) that help speakers manage conversation in many ways, such as expressing attitude, or softening statements. The article turns to several existing literature about gender and pragmatics and provides relevant examples to show how different is the men and women's use of pragmatic markers in both languages. After discussion, this paper talks about how a better understanding of these patterns can help English language teaching (ELT) as well as cross‑cultural communication.

This paper explores the agricultural terminology of the Hindi language, focusing on its origin, linguistic features, and comparison with Uzbek equivalents. The study reveals that Hindi agricultural terms have deep historical roots, derived from Sanskrit, Persian, and English, and are constantly evolving under the influence of modern technology. The analysis highlights their semantic clarity, cultural relevance, and significance for comparative linguistic research. Introduction. Language reflects every aspect of human activity, including economic and agricultural life. Agriculture plays a vital role in India’s economy, with the majority of the population engaged in farming. As a result, Hindi has developed a rich and diverse system of agricultural terminology. This thesis aims to analyze the structure, meaning, and development of Hindi agricultural terms and to compare them with similar terms in the Uzbek language.

Currently the English language is a universal language and significant steps are being taken by the education system of Uzbekistan to develop the system of teaching English as a foreign language. The Presidential Decree №1875- “On measures of improvement of learning foreign languages” contributes a noteworthy progress of teaching English as a foreign language in the educational institutions of Uzbekistan.

This article examines the relationship between language and culture from the perspective of kinship terminology in English and Uzbek. Using a comparative analysis, the study demonstrates how kinship terms reflect cultural values, social structures, and familial roles that are unique to each language.

This article focuses on the similarities between the Turkish and Khorezm dialects of the Uzbek language in terms of nouns and their differences from other dialects of the Uzbek language, and also provides a number of examples. In some aspects, the Khorezm dialect is closer to the Turkish language than dialects belonging to other dialects Uzbek language. There are many words that show the difference between the Khorezm dialect and other Uzbek dialects and have the same meaning in Turkish. This article focuses on the similarities between the Turkish and Khorezm dialects of the Uzbek language in terms of nouns and their differences from other dialects of the Uzbek language, and also provides a number of examples. In some aspects, the Khorezm dialect is closer to the Turkish language than dialects belonging to other dialects Uzbek language. There are many words that show the difference between the Khorezm dialect and other Uzbek dialects and have the same meaning in Turkish. As in all languages and dialects of the world, in the Turkish language and the Khorezm dialect of the Uzbek language, which are considered languages and dialects belonging to the Oguz group, there are words and phrases associated with nouns, adjectives, numbers, adverbs and verbs that distinguish them from other languages. Among the synonyms and the same words in the Turkish language and the Khorezm dialect are kinship (dayı), architecture (dalan), parts of the human body (dudak), medicine (öksürük) and examples can be given from many other fields. Some words used in the Turkish language and in the Khorezm dialect express many different meanings in Turkish and express a certain meaning in the Khorezm dialect, or vice versa. There are some differences in the pronunciation of similar words in the Turkish language and the Khorezm dialect. Such differences are due mainly to the fact that the sounds -e and -a and -u and -o give way to others. Although some words exist in the Uzbek literary language, in practice they were preserved only in the Khorezm, and they have the same meaning in Turkish.

This paper provides information about meronymy, and its differences, particularly, semantic and stylistic features, and the relationship of comparative analysis in two languages Uzbek and English. Furthermore, it is explained that words related to meronymy expressed the linguistic and non-linguistic appearance of words between the two languages, determining mutual relations in semantic meanings and stylistic colors from different point of view.